An access review is a periodic, documented check of who has permission to which systems and data, confirming every grant is still needed and correctly scoped.
Access reviews exist because permissions creep silently over time: employees change roles, contractors finish projects, and integrations get provisioned for a one-off task and never revoked. Left unchecked, this produces "privilege sprawl," where far more people and services can touch sensitive data than the business actually intends. A review forces someone accountable to look at the current grant list, compare it against what each person or system role actually requires, and revoke anything that no longer fits.
In a SOC 2 or ISO 27001 program, access reviews are a required control and an auditor will ask for evidence: who reviewed what, when, and what changed as a result. Mature programs run them on a fixed cadence (quarterly is common) for admin-level and data-sensitive systems, and treat the review itself as an auditable event, not just a one-time cleanup.
Neotask's agent permission model ties directly into access reviews: every agent authorization scope and connected integration is enumerable per tenant, so a quarterly review can walk the exact list of what an AI agent can read, write, or execute rather than guessing. Revoking a stale scope in that review immediately narrows what any agent run can do next.
$0/mo
Download without a card and start for free.
$50/mo
The full personal agent platform for one person.
$100/mo
One company workspace with room to add your team.
$200/mo
Multiple workspaces and capacity for larger teams.
Explore: Integrations · Skills · Solutions · Use cases · Examples · Comparisons · Templates · Blog · Docs